Closed DandelionSprout closed 2 years ago
Both lists are essentially the same, the current "Easylist Cookie" contains a directive understood by uBO to load https://secure.fanboy.co.nz/easylist_cookie_specific_uBO.txt as a sublist:
! Include ubO specific
!#include easylist_cookie_specific_uBO.txt
Okay, so on re-analysis, it appears that the EasyList Cookie versions are the same.
However, one small section seems to be differenct and unique in Annoyance (according to text comparison in Sublime Text), although the difference is much smaller than what it originally seemed like:
I get zero filters used for https://secure.fanboy.co.nz/fanboy-cookiemonster_ubo.txt
when I enable the stock "Easylist Cookie" while disabling all other lists in uBO.
That part I agree on. But my recentmost comment was for Fanboy's Annoyance instead.
Comparing Annoyances' versions in the same way:
Why not just ask @ryanbr to explain the discrepancy before making any change here?
Fanboy appears to have split his annoyances lists into uBO- and ABP-targeting versions, with the former having considerably more entries from I can determine at a surface glance when it comes to Annoyance (84,197 vs 74,607, ±500).
And although there hasn't been much fanfare or announcements of that split, I can only presume that Fanboy wishes for uBO users to use the new uBO list versions.