why return a router for the methods strictslash, skipClean and use Encoded Path?

[prr123]

Describe the problem you're having

A clear and concise description of what the bug is. no bug, but an apparent redundant implementation The methods already are linked to a pointer of Router, so there appears no need to return another pointer to the type Router. …

Versions

Go version: go version

package version: run git rev-parse HEAD inside the repo

…

"Show me the code!"

A minimal code snippet can be useful, otherwise we're left guessing! func (r *Router*) SkipClean(value bool) Router** Hint: wrap it with backticks to format it

…

[amustaque97]

@prr123 As far as I know, mux is following the builder pattern here.

[prr123]

Perhaps the reason is to allow daisy-chaining of methods? i.e. the builder pattern allows for daisy-chaining of methods?

[amustaque97]

Yes builder pattern will allow method chaining.

[ianling]

This can be closed, unless OP feels the question has not been answered adequately.