Closed JannesHN closed 6 years ago
I do not think so Jannes. The grid is decisive only on the parent material that will be cut. Finer grid will make the cut more problematic and prone to failure. I was already considering to remove the flat metals and replace them with pyramid shapes, but other reasons like availability stopped me from doing so
On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 9:41 AM JannesHN notifications@github.com wrote:
The grid in the water tables, on which the sheet metals is placed, is decisive for the size of the shapes that can be cutted. Making a finer grid, that might be placed on top of the larger grid, allows for smaller shapes to be cutted by the machine.
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/goscommons/CNC-Plasma-Table/issues/36, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AkwT6ZyUlGYRTr4m687RyfmEE_NyWWVnks5uLwzwgaJpZM4VmbpZ .
-- Emmanouil Karamousadakis Certified Permaculture Designer AGreekulture Farmstead Winthrop, ME 04364
The grid in the water tables, on which the sheet metals is placed, is decisive for the size of the shapes that can be cutted. Making a finer grid, that might be placed on top of the larger grid, allows for smaller shapes to be cutted by the machine.