search

gouchangjiang / opengeoda

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/opengeoda
GNU General Public License v3.0
0 stars 0 forks source link

Table: Constant field #141

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
Under unary operations, the constant field behind the variable one is confusing 
since they seem to be mutually exclusive . E.g., if as in attached image, you 
are choosing assign constant and enter a value for constant, then whatever 
variable you specify is ignored. And, vice versa, when a variable is specified, 
the constant value is ignored.

If these two fields are mutually exclusive, we could stack them on top of each 
other and only activate them as either-or choices?

Do we want to replicate this for the binary operations, too?

Legacy addressed this issue by allowing users to type a constant value in the 
variable fields.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by jkoschin...@gmail.com on 18 Aug 2011 at 7:14

Attachments:

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
Fixed in 0.9.9.15.2

Original comment by mmcc...@gmail.com on 31 Aug 2011 at 8:50