Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago
Creating a new obfuscation rule to exclude methods based on the type of their
arguments, seems too special to me. But, as you wrote, the method names have
common postfixes. You could check for methods ending with "_Click".
> Also, is there a way to exclude only the method name?
I am not sure what you mean. <SkipMethod> only skips the obfuscation of method
names.
I changed the issue's label from Type-Defect to Type-Enhancement.
Original comment by webbi...@gmail.com
on 11 Feb 2011 at 9:09
Well, what I mean is, consider for WPF's case...
Essentially all callbacks from WPF have a type from WPF's assembly in them.
Usually RoutedEventArgs. So this would not be particularly special - I would
apply it to all methods in my project.
Original comment by xoc...@gmail.com
on 12 Feb 2011 at 12:06
I am not sure if this has been further investigated, but I will spare some time
later to explore the WPF area on my own fork at
https://github.com/lextm/obfuscar
Original comment by lextu...@gmail.com
on 28 Apr 2013 at 7:44
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
xoc...@gmail.com
on 11 Feb 2011 at 4:05