Artifact name convention

[robertoschwald]

The plugin artifact currently is named "joda-time-.jar".

Normally plugins use the convention

grails-plugin-<name>-<version>.jar

[graemerocher]

That is not the convention in Grails 3 as far as I am aware. Other than for core plugins

[robertoschwald]

I thought so, and I also think its a good idea to distinguish the plugin artifact from dependencies to avoid naming collisions with artifacts.

E.g. the joda-time jar has the same name, so the risk to have a naming clash is eminent:

joda-time-2.0.0.jar
joda-time-2.9.1.jar

Other plugins I use, have the said convention:

grails-plugin-async-3.0.10.jar
grails-plugin-codecs-3.0.10.jar
grails-plugin-controllers-3.0.10.jar
grails-plugin-converters-3.0.10.jar
grails-plugin-databinding-3.0.10.jar
grails-plugin-datasource-3.0.10.jar
grails-plugin-domain-class-3.0.10.jar
grails-plugin-events-3.0.10.jar
grails-plugin-filters-3.0.10.jar
grails-plugin-gsp-3.0.10.jar
grails-plugin-i18n-3.0.10.jar
grails-plugin-interceptors-3.0.10.jar
grails-plugin-mimetypes-3.0.10.jar
grails-plugin-rest-3.0.10.jar
grails-plugin-services-3.0.10.jar
grails-plugin-url-mappings-3.0.10.jar
grails-plugin-validation-3.0.10.jar

[graemerocher]

They can be distinguished by their group id, all plugins are published under the org.grails.plugins group. The plugins you mention there are all core plugins published with grails

[robertoschwald]

Yes, but if you create a war file, an artifact filename can clash with the plugin jar filename, or?