Improve validation tests for unpack builtin functions

[haoxli]

The f16 need to enable extra extension, to make the case simpler, I don't want to enable the extension in the return type validation tests. And we have tested f32 and other 32-bits types in the tests, no need f16 here.

Issues: #3618, #3620

---

Requirements for PR author:

• [x] All missing test coverage is tracked with "TODO" or .unimplemented().
• [x] New helpers are /** documented */ and new helper files are found in helper_index.txt.
• [x] Test behaves as expected in a WebGPU implementation. (If not passing, explain above.)
• [x] Test have be tested with compatibility mode validation enabled and behave as expected. (If not passing, explain above.)

Requirements for reviewer sign-off:

• [ ] Tests are properly located in the test tree.
• [ ] Test descriptions allow a reader to "read only the test plans and evaluate coverage completeness", and accurately reflect the test code.
• [ ] Tests provide complete coverage (including validation control cases). Missing coverage MUST be covered by TODOs.
• [ ] Helpers and types promote readability and maintainability.

When landing this PR, be sure to make any necessary issue status updates.

[haoxli]

Ok, I will update the unpack builtins validation using validateConstOrOverrideBuiltinEval with return types.

[haoxli]

@ben-clayton PTAL! Thanks.