Closed pjfanning closed 2 years ago
Would it be possible to support a cache feature like this one?
Hi @pjfanning, yes I think we should be able to support that.
setup-graalvm would often be used alongside setup-java and it would be nice to have the 2 actions maintain similar capabilities.
Can the caching provided by setup-java be shared with setup-graalvm if both are used at the same time? If setup-graalvm supports something similar, I wonder if this could cause caches to be created twice.
@fniephaus I guess the driving use case would be for use cases where someone only uses setup-graalvm (and maybe used setup-java before but changed over to setup-graalvm).
For users who use both, they could choose to set the cache param on just on of the 2. The documentation could mention this.
Yes, that sounds good. It seems we could re-use the cache.ts
from the setup-java
action, but I am not sure if the licenses allow that. I will need to look into this.
I think we should be able to "fork" the cache.ts
if we add the original license to its header. Would you be interested in contributing this, @pjfanning?
@fniephaus I've never been involved in writing Github Actions. I'll need some pointers. The first issue I hit was with cache.ts and the imports of '@actions/cache' and '@actions/glob' - I'm not sure how actions-java gets this to work. I'm getting a CI issue - https://github.com/pjfanning/setup-graalvm/runs/6926051352?check_suite_focus=true
I think you'll need to add @actions/cache
and @actions/glob
as dependencies: https://github.com/actions/toolkit/tree/master (npm install --save ...
I think). Also note that you'll have to regenerate the files under dist/
via npm run build
and check in the generated files.
You'll also need to touch the action.yml
and add the new option.
We've just implemented dependency caching a la actions/setup-java. Could you please take this for a spin, @pjfanning?
Would it be possible to support a cache feature like this one?
https://github.com/actions/setup-java#caching-packages-dependencies
setup-graalvm would often be used alongside setup-java and it would be nice to have the 2 actions maintain similar capabilities.