Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago
See:
http://groups.google.com/group/pygr-dev/browse_thread/thread/4a2d1648101a4b78
and
http://groups.google.com/group/pygr-dev/browse_thread/thread/f03601c835c6bc57
Original comment by the.good...@gmail.com
on 18 Mar 2009 at 7:20
We completed most of this in the merging of the seqdb-review branch. Titus, are
there PrefixUnionDict issues that you want to discuss as part of this review?
Original comment by cjlee...@gmail.com
on 8 Apr 2009 at 1:55
See
http://groups.google.com/group/pygr-dev/browse_thread/thread/f03601c835c6bc57/14
25a52a7f67c33d?lnk=gst&q=prefixuniondict#1425a52a7f67c33d
where Chris says:
"""
I'll answer the PrefixUnionDict questions in a separate email.
"""
There are a few unanswered questions in there still, I think: to quote,
SeqPrefixUnionDict is oddly named.
PrefixUnionDict could contain __iadd__ behavior (instead of
SeqPrefixUnionDict, which inherits from it solely to add __iadd__
behavior). Why not do things this way?
There's an 'if' statement in SeqPrefixUnionDict.__iadd__ that can
never be reached, as far as I can tell. Could someone (Chris) please
verify that for me?
In two places (SeqPrefixUnionDict.__iadd__, find @CTB untested; and
_PrefixUnionDictInverse.__getitem__, find @CTB abstraction) explicit
knowledge of annotation objects is assumed in classes that otherwise
don't know anything special about them. Any way to deal with this
better or should I just suck up and deal & write some tests?
A few PrefixUnionDict issues:
- PrefixUnionDict.__contains__ can take either a sequence ID or a
sequence object. This is inconsistent with __getitem__ (which only
takes seq IDs). Ugly.
- PrefixUnionDict.__init__ takes an argument 'trypath' that is really a
list of paths to try. Could we rename this to 'trypaths'? Or should
I just suck up and deal & write a nice doc?
- PrefixUnionDict.writeHeaderFile function (etc.) isn't used anywhere
in the code. How useful is it?
- PrefixUnionDict.newMemberDict(...) and the associated
_PrefixUnionDictMember class don't have a clear purpose to me.
Could someone give me a concrete use case? If not, maybe they should
be removed or something; they're confusing!
- _PrefixUnionDictMember.default handling could probably be written
in a more standard way using dict.setdefault, no? How much code depends
on this specific behavior?
Original comment by the.good...@gmail.com
on 8 Apr 2009 at 2:01
Original comment by the.good...@gmail.com
on 26 Apr 2009 at 8:47
All changes have been reviewed and all the code has been committed to master.
Closing the issue.
Original comment by mare...@gmail.com
on 13 May 2009 at 2:05
See comment 3. Am I missing something?
Original comment by the.good...@gmail.com
on 13 May 2009 at 2:24
Original comment by mare...@gmail.com
on 10 Jun 2009 at 1:47
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
the.good...@gmail.com
on 11 Feb 2009 at 1:51