Open mati865 opened 6 months ago
Are there any REAL problems with the library? Are there any bugs or security issues with it?
An alternative wold be to get rid of the json library alltogether. It is currently used to pass some data withing same process from one piece of code to another, which I am not very proud of.
Pull requests are welcome ;)
Are there any REAL problems with the library?
It contains undefined behaviour if as_bytes
is called before attach
as the report mentions: https://github.com/maciejhirsz/json-rust/issues/196
Since there is no visible segfault right now I assume the struct is initialized properly but that sounds a bit fragile.
So probably the only issue right now is having to explain why it's ok to ignore this specific advisory.
https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2022-0081 lists some alternatives, jzon
particularly looks like drop in replacement.
An alternative wold be to get rid of the json library alltogether. It is currently used to pass some data withing same process from one piece of code to another, which I am not very proud of.
Sounds like a viable solution as well, I'll try to look into it in the near future.
Describe the bug you encountered:
Cargo-deny reports several issues when adding this crate to the tree. One of them is related to
json
crate that is unmaintained and unsound. It'd be welcome if this crate could migrate to one of alternatives listed in the advisory.What did you expect to happen instead?
Clean report from cargo-deny.
How did you install
pyroscope-rs
?Added it as a dependency to one of the crates in the project.
version:
pyroscope 0.5.7
os: Ubuntu 22.04