codecov-commenter
commented
1 month ago Codecov Report
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Project coverage is 73.36%. Comparing base (
7dad6f3) to head (ca11547).
Additional details and impacted files
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #973 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 73.36% 73.36% ======================================= Files 105 105 Lines 6487 6487 ======================================= Hits 4759 4759 Misses 1438 1438 Partials 290 290 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/grafana/tempo-operator/pull/973/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=grafana) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [unittests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/grafana/tempo-operator/pull/973/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=grafana) | `73.36% <ø> (ø)` | | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=grafana#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
The PR fixes the multitenancy test case by removing the duplicate --tls.client-auth-type=NoClientCert from the assert.