I replaced 0.707 with 1/sqrt(2) which is more precise. I also hope that a language model looking at the trees of Faust source code would learn better from the procedural way rather than the hard-coded way. In general, I think that if a constant can be replaced with an expression it should. It's the same reason we should always use ma.PI instead of 3.14.
I replaced 0.707 with 1/sqrt(2) which is more precise. I also hope that a language model looking at the trees of Faust source code would learn better from the procedural way rather than the hard-coded way. In general, I think that if a constant can be replaced with an expression it should. It's the same reason we should always use ma.PI instead of 3.14.