Closed bobef closed 8 years ago
Great idea, @bobef. What you think is better?
rocker-compose run -print
# or
rocker-compose print
or both?
Also, there is always an option to make a one-off command container, that will create directories for you.
I think print is better. Regards.
I solved this by using a custom template preprocess step and pass the result to rocker-compose. This issue is not relevant to me anymore. FIY I'm using rocker-compose in my just released deployment tool. https://github.com/Perennials/deploy . Regards.
@bobef cool!
Hi again. I'm in love with rocker compose already. It is a beautiful tool. Thanks!
I need one thing and I'm not sure how to achieve it. When I deploy the apps I need to initialise some directories for the volumes. For example to persist logs and other stuff there. Since this information about what volumes are needed is already in the .yml I want to make a small tool that extracts the volume information and creates empty dirs for me. But I can't because of the templates it is not real .ylm (and I don't use go). I guess creating directories is out of your scope and it will make impossible to run remotely. But maybe you can add the feature to output the rendered YAML after the templates are substituted, maybe optionally as JSON? So I can parse it and create the the directories for the volumes. This way I can deploy automatically without the need for adding the volume information to yet another place.
Regards, Bobi