Open meidachen opened 10 months ago
yeah currently they use projection matrix which assumes it's always the center, but in fact you can get rid of that and instead use $K$ which allows any cx
cy
. But you have to derive the gradient by yourself (not difficult at all).
yeah currently they use projection matrix which assumes it's always the center, but in fact you can get rid of that and instead use K which allows any
cx
cy
. But you have to derive the gradient by yourself (not difficult at all).
I would like to ask if I want to add cx and cy, which derivatives of the variables need to be modified? I can see from the code that the derivation process does not seem to require any special modifications. Is there anything I haven't noticed?
yeah currently they use projection matrix which assumes it's always the center, but in fact you can get rid of that and instead use K which allows any
cx
cy
. But you have to derive the gradient by yourself (not difficult at all).I would like to ask if I want to add cx and cy, which derivatives of the variables need to be modified? I can see from the code that the derivation process does not seem to require any special modifications. Is there anything I haven't noticed?
yes, there is no need to modify any derivations. just modify the getProjectionMatrix by using the intrinsics K. For the details refer this link https://stackoverflow.com/questions/22064084/how-to-create-perspective-projection-matrix-given-focal-points-and-camera-princ. I hope this can help.
@Octweiyi yes, you are right, I checked it and found that you can replace the projection matrix with
P[0, 0] = 2 * fx / W
P[1, 1] = 2 * fy / H
P[0, 2] = 2 * (cx / W) - 0.5
P[1, 2] = 2 * (cy / H) - 0.5
P[2, 2] = -(zfar + znear) / (zfar - znear)
P[3, 2] = 1.0
P[2, 3] = -(2 * zfar * znear) / (zfar - znear)
also zfar
and znear
are really irrelevant, you can set them to 0
and it doesn't affect the result
It feels like there is a small mistake in your equation @kwea123:
P[0, 2] = 2 * (cx / W) - 1
P[1, 2] = 2 * (cy / H) - 1
When cx = W/2
, P[0, 2]
should be 0 instead of 0.5 in your equation.
I wanted to ask one more thing: Won't the camera intrinsics be scaled when the resolution is scaled? I didn't find any code which recomputes the FovX
and FovY
when the resolution is not 1.
Ref: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/74749690/how-will-the-camera-intrinsics-change-if-an-image-is-cropped-resized
@cs-mshah FovX
and FovY
do not need rescale because they are always there. But when you use the intrinsics K
, you need to rescale it according to your new resolution.
Hi,
Thank you so much for sharing this amazing work!! I have a quick question about the camera intrinsics that are being used when rendering. Do you assume the c_x and c_y are always at the center of the image (width / 2, height / 2)?
Thank you!
Meida Chen