search

graphhopper / map-matching

The map matching functionality is now located in the main repository https://github.com/graphhopper/graphhopper#map-matching
https://www.graphhopper.com/open-source/
Apache License 2.0
785 stars 274 forks source link

map-matching SNAPSHOT versions #46

Closed devemux86 closed 8 years ago

devemux86 commented 8 years ago

Is there a SNAPSHOT version for map-matching following the corresponding GraphHopper one and according to the master version in pom.xml?

i.e. 0.7-SNAPSHOT in https://oss.sonatype.org/content/groups/public/com/graphhopper/

karussell commented 8 years ago

Currently not automatically deployed but you should be able to always use the latest master from GH core.

devemux86 commented 8 years ago

Sorry Peter, I didn't understand. I use the latest master from GH. I'm asking how we can use the latest master from map-matching without building the code.

karussell commented 8 years ago

I'm asking how we can use the latest master from map-matching without building the code.

Sorry, I meant with "not automatically deployed" that you would need to build it yourself from code. (There is no such process yet like it is the case for GH)

karussell commented 8 years ago

This depends a bit on this issue https://github.com/bmwcarit/hmm-lib/issues/4 where e.g. our copied hmm-lib module does not include a distributionManagement section. But I know that this is already in the works ...

karussell commented 8 years ago

Will now deployed regularly with the core if no errors as graphhopper-map-matching. For now this is just a workaround using hmm lib as if it is 'our' module.

karussell commented 8 years ago

BTW: should we rename graphhopper-map-matching to graphhopper-map-matching-core similarly like we renamed graphhopper to graphhopper-core? Although this is not that important as it does not really conflict

devemux86 commented 8 years ago

should we rename graphhopper-map-matching to graphhopper-map-matching-core similarly like we renamed graphhopper to graphhopper-core?

You mean the artifactId in the pom?

karussell commented 8 years ago

Yes

devemux86 commented 8 years ago

Yes that could change, its folder has the -core already.

karussell commented 8 years ago

Ok, done