Open zacherkkila opened 8 months ago
I think essentially we just want to disable this code:
Which is useful to disable in both watch
and watch --once
modes.
Maybe --always-different
(-a
) or --no-ignore-unchanged
or --no-require-changes
or similar might make sense? --force
(-f
) also makes sense, but it's a bit less specific and limits our future options, perhaps. A --force-when-unchanged
flag that --force
automatically enables might make sense... but we'd need some more forces (--force-actions
) first.
@jemgillam suggests --force-migration
which I think is pretty apt - you're forcing the migration to happen even if no changes occurred.
Feature description
Often we use tricks like
select n
and increment the number or changecurrent.sql
in another way to get it to run.It would be handy to have a flag to force run
--once
if the file hasn't changed.Motivating example
When testing a data migration, it is often very handy to have an idempotent migration that can get run multiple times as you add/change data in your application.
Typical workflow for me in a data migration involves
Though workarounds are simple as described in the feature description, I think it would be a nice add.
Breaking changes
n/a
Supporting development
I [tick all that apply]: