Closed davaymne closed 4 years ago
That's correct. It is because of how we implemented our schema in the subgraph, and we are working on creating a subgraphDeployment --> subgraphVersion --> namedSubgraph relationship (we'll update the UI once it's ready)
We updated this to show Qm...
hash in the table as well. Maybe not ideal, but should work for now. We'll probably update soon to link it to the actual subgraph.
There is no match and no easy way to identify pairs Deployment <-> Subgraph
Subgraph overview:
Current Indexing: