Open TimHolzherr opened 4 years ago
Is this the intended behavior, a bug or am I missing a flag?
@TimHolzherr Neither, I just forgot to implement this. I will look if I can quickly implement this or not.
👍
Useful stuff 👍
Any updates @IvanGoncharov. Running into a similar issue pointed by Tim
Any updates @IvanGoncharov?.I am also running into a similar issue. Thx in advanced!
Hi
Amazing Project!
When I try to extend an input of a mutation like this:
the resulting schema looks correct but graphql-faker still sends the additional field "foo" to my api server. The api I am using is strict and does not allow additional fields to be present. => I cannot extend a input with graphql-faker. Is this the intended behavior, a bug or am I missing a flag?
Thanks for your effort!