PR #181 added support for type refining fragments and was released in version 0.6.0. The existing examples, however, were not augmented to demonstrate how to work with such a fragment. I managed to piece it together from the newly added tests and some println! debugging. It wasn't immediately clear to me that a new enum would be generated and that I would need to pattern-match on that.
I could take a crack at it. It looks to me like working off the GitHub example would be easiest since it's publicly accessible.
PR #181 added support for type refining fragments and was released in version 0.6.0. The existing examples, however, were not augmented to demonstrate how to work with such a fragment. I managed to piece it together from the newly added tests and some
println!
debugging. It wasn't immediately clear to me that a new enum would be generated and that I would need to pattern-match on that.I could take a crack at it. It looks to me like working off the GitHub example would be easiest since it's publicly accessible.