Closed elcharitas closed 1 month ago
CI Checks seem to fail and this is weird since the issues arise from the juniper
crate.
Any pointers?
Thank you for the PR, sorry for the slow response! Are there backward compat considerations here? I see you have a default type but I am not sure. Also, can you add a test so we can be sure this doesn't regress?
Thanks for checking in. To answer your concerns..
Are there backward compat considerations here?
Yes, this PR is fully backward compatible. How do we know? There's a test already included here and it passes with no need for further configuration.
can you add a test so we can be sure this doesn't regress
Yes I can add a test for custom Request<T>
type. However, I must point out that this PR makes no algo change whatsoever, it only allows passing generic request types making juniper compatible with different request types.
@elcharitas @LegNeato I'll look into it too in the next few working days.
Should resolve #1102