Closed myrho closed 5 months ago
@defconst is this a data inconsistency?
SELECT no_transactions FROM address_outgoing_relations WHERE src_address_id_group = 1582 AND src_address_id_secondary_group in (0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18) AND src_address_id = 39559755 AND dst_address_id = 50404330;
no_transactions
-----------------
(0 rows)
whereas the counter part yields a result
SELECT no_transactions FROM address_incoming_relations WHERE dst_address_id_group = 2016 AND dst_address_id_secondary_group in (0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18) AND src_address_id = 39559755 AND dst_address_id = 50404330;
no_transactions
-----------------
1
(1 rows)
src_address_id_secondary_group
is 21 for outgoing relations
CQL
cqlsh:eth_transformed_20220624_lq> SELECT no_transactions FROM address_outgoing_relations WHERE src_address_id_group = 1582 AND src_address_id_secondary_group=21 AND src_address_id = 39559755 AND dst_address_id = 50404330;
no_transactions
-----------------
1
Spark
In [14]: addr_in_rel.filter((col("src_address_id")==39559755) & (col("dst_address_id") == 50404330)).show(20)
+--------------------+------------------------------+--------------+--------------+---------------+--------------------+
|dst_address_id_group|dst_address_id_secondary_group|dst_address_id|src_address_id|no_transactions| value|
+--------------------+------------------------------+--------------+--------------+---------------+--------------------+
| 2016| 0| 50404330| 39559755| 1|{6522050900000000...|
+--------------------+------------------------------+--------------+--------------+---------------+--------------------+
In [15]: addr_out_rel.filter((col("src_address_id")==39559755) & (col("dst_address_id") == 50404330)).show(20)
+--------------------+------------------------------+--------------+--------------+---------------+--------------------+
|src_address_id_group|src_address_id_secondary_group|src_address_id|dst_address_id|no_transactions| value|
+--------------------+------------------------------+--------------+--------------+---------------+--------------------+
| 1582| 21| 39559755| 50404330| 1|{6522050900000000...|
+--------------------+------------------------------+--------------+--------------+---------------+--------------------+
Then this should be 21?
cqlsh:eth_transformed_20220624_lq> select max_secondary_id FROM address_transacti
ons_secondary_ids WHERE address_id_group = 1582;
max_secondary_id
------------------
18
(1 rows)
close or postpone?
postpone
Example above no longer reproducible, but observed again for address https://app.ikna.io/graph/eth/address/0xe1e890c8464db729ca3c52f8409107835c2ca2bf#0
0x8f22f2063d253846b53609231ed80fa571bc0c8f
(159494003) and 0xe1e890c8464db729ca3c52f8409107835c2ca2bf
(172691167)0xd551234ae421e3bcba99a0da6d736074f22192ff
(39559755) and 0xe1e890c8464db729ca3c52f8409107835c2ca2bf
(172691167)Keyspace eth_transformed_20220815_lq
(height 15342780)
With keyspace eth_transformed_20220826_lq
the latter one yields txs. The first one still is empty (verified through Rest API).
seems to be solved
see #!eth/addresslink/0xd551234ae421e3bcba99a0da6d736074f22192ff/0xe344e4b209e8eabaa2a6ddd1b0aa120b7599af25