Closed chadwhitacre closed 6 years ago
Could we find some interesting project that we could hire Libraries.io to do and publish the results?
Does OSI have any of those fancy scarfs left?
@dmk246 has said she's willing to help with writing the thank-you notes. Stickers are #1176.
Talking this through with @chrisecjohns ... what about we offer different distribution algorithms at different levels? I think @andrew was suggesting similarly the other day.
running total ($) | amount ($) | method |
---|---|---|
100,000 | 100,000 | according to Libraries.io metrics (SourceRank?) |
250,000 | 150,000 | voting by companies |
500,000 | 250,000 | fellows program |
1,000,000 | 500,000 | consortium of non-profits |
??? | ??? | ??? |
I'm a little confused by levels/tiers. You seem to be using them in aggregate rather than per giving company?
Or is it per-company aggregate? Over multiple campaigns, for example?
@mattbk Fair enough. I've split out https://github.com/gratipay/inside.gratipay.com/issues/1184 for rewards, keeping this for overall campaign goals. I guess my thinking is that unlocking things at certain goal levels could incentivize contribution w/o as much overhead as rewards entail.
I think our first reward tier should be a hand-written thank you note with stickers and a heart coin for the first donors up to $100,000.
Assuming for the moment that we reach that ... what next?