Closed santasa99 closed 1 year ago
Normally these should be two different issues.
To add a rendering of something, there needs to be enough general adoption. There are 2 historic=stećak and 450 clock.
Additionally, neither icon will work at 14x14, which is what we use.
Thanks for the suggestions. Sketches like you made are valuable and fine as a start but are better placed on the OSM wiki. For actual use here we would be looking for something in line with our style guidelines.
Like @pnorman said - the tags you are proposing are all for the moment not in broad enough use to mandate rendering. For reference:
historic=stećak_necropolis
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic%3Dste%C4%87ak_necropolis
16 uses
historic=stećak
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic%3Dste%C4%87ak
2 uses
tower:type=clock
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tower:type%3Dclock
450 uses
if rendered symbol should be consistent with that of tower:type=bell_tower
Like for tower:type=bell_tower
there is the problem of competing concepts of mapping/tagging the clock/bell vs. mapping as a secondary tag to the built structure supporting it - for clocks the standalone amenity=clock
is much more widespread - see #3577. For bells the opposite is the case (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Bell) - though in reality, standalone bells are widespread in some parts of the world (like certain christian traditions). Documenting where tower:type=clock
is used vs. where amenity=clock
is used would be helpful for this.
It would definitively be good if we'd have more comprehensive rendering of historic features in the map (which depends a bit on broadly and consistently used taggings for those of course). But these two tags are not really the point to start with here.
Side note (off-topic here though) - it has been long standing informal convention to avoid using non-ASCII characters in classifying tag values. While this is not a firm requirement (neither here nor elsewhere) this is definitely something to consider when inventing new tags. But this just as a hint here - this is a discussion for a different place.
I am closing this as none of the tags suggested currently would find consensus support to be added in this style.
Am I allowed to comment, more to see if some additional clarifications could be made, after closing?
Sure.
Proposal I would like to propose two new icons for carto rendering. It concerns three Tag pages and their respective tags:
I created icons for Tag pages {{tag|historic|stećak_necropolis}} and {{tag|historic|stećak}} with the icon File:Stecak icon osm 16.svg and {{tag|tower:type|clock}} with File:Clock-tower.svg
first for tags:
historic=stećak_necropolis historic=stećak
and second one for:
tower:type=clock
Why We lack icons that can properly illustrate these specific features.
Icons Tag:historic=stećak necropolis [https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic%3Dste%C4%87ak_necropolis] and Tag:historic=stećak [https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic%3Dste%C4%87ak] Tag:tower:type=clock [https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tower:type%3Dclock]
Please, don't laugh at this, I am completely new here. :-)