Open imagico opened 7 months ago
Above sounds reasonable.
182k shop=yes
and 80k office=yes
. In both cases about 70% have names.
Possible suggestions for rendering that would hint to both map user and mappers that data is incomplete:
Use a lighter shade of shop / office colour for dot and any name. Using a lightened colour rather than reduced opacity might cause less semantic confusion with private access e.g. on parking.
A common grey colour (as in highway=road
) for "incomplete objects". This has been suggested, but probably too jarring.
Use a lighter shade of shop / office colour for dot and any name
We already use that for access restricted POIs so it would be confusing.
A common grey colour
We already use gray dots for bollards (small) and waterway barriers (large):
https://imagico.de/map/styleinfo/#style=osmcarto§ion=tags&key=barrier&value=bollard https://imagico.de/map/styleinfo/#style=osmcarto§ion=tags&key=waterway&value=lock_gate
We currently have a number of catch-all renderings in the style were we depict features with a certain key independent of the value. That in particular
building=*
shop=*
office=*
for
building
andoffice
we do this for the valueyes
like for any other value while forshop
we explicitly excludeshop=yes
. In all three cases theyes
is broadly accepted as valid tagging if a more specific classification is not available to the mapper.IMO we should:
shop=yes
andoffice=yes
equally in that regard.highway=road
for roads.For
building=yes
i would not suggest a special treatment because it is so widely used without being broadly considered to be lacking more specific information.See also #4723.