Closed jabbrwcky closed 2 years ago
Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.
Hey @jabbrwcky, thanks for the great contribution! We will test and review your PR asap, but it might take a little while as our load is pretty high at the moment.
@dennisoelkers That's fine, I'm not in a hurry. Just wanted to share the improvements we built for our installation.
Hi @jabbrwcky, extremely useful contrubution, thank you for the work! @dennisoelkers, @bernd is there are any information about timings of rewiewing/merging and so on? Think this PR would closes issue https://github.com/graylog-labs/graylog-plugin-metrics-reporter/issues/35 very well.
Is there anything preventing this from getting merged?
@pschichtel IDK, happy to see it merged eventually
Hi, is there anything hindering progress on this PR? It's been in 'ready for review' for some time now š
still no signs of merging? :(
I've found this: https://github.com/Graylog2/graylog2-server/pull/10767
Akhyar Amarullah @.***> schrieb am Fr., 18. Juni 2021, 08:02:
still no signs of merging? :(
ā You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/graylog-labs/graylog-plugin-metrics-reporter/pull/37#issuecomment-863779569, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AABHBBRPYMAGM7GUTXMBOI3TTLOP3ANCNFSM4IQ7L7FQ .
@akhy As @fungusakafungus mentioned, we will have a built-in Prometheus exporter in the upcoming 4.1 release which uses a better naming scheme. We will have documentation for this up soon. Watch https://docs.graylog.org/en/4.1/pages/metrics.html (doesn't exist yet :wink:)
@jabbrwcky, @akhy: With the prometheus exporter in 4.1, is there still need for this PR or can we close it?
@dennisoelkers I am currently not working with Graylog due to change of positions, so I no longer have real stakes in this.
Is this MR still relevant given that graylog directly integrates it since (I believe) 4.1 ?
@pschichtel No, it can be closed. Thanks for the heads-up! :+1:
The current plugin version embeds ids in the metric names, which leads to a proliferation of metrics names and makes aggregations more difficult than necessary:
The updated version updates the prometheus clients version and introduces a custom sample builder to build better metrics names:
For all metrics that contain an Id in the metric name, the Id is extracted to a label; other metric names are not modified.
For steams and stream rules some additional information is extracted and provided as labels: