Closed negar7918 closed 8 years ago
@negar7918 Thank you very much for your contribution! I have a few questions left and then we're ready to merge.
ok I will be answering your questions :)
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 3:23 PM, Jochen Schalanda notifications@github.com wrote:
@negar7918 https://github.com/negar7918 Thank you very much for your contribution! I have a few questions left and then we're ready to merge.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/Graylog2/syslog4j-graylog2/pull/6#issuecomment-185226601 .
I am a bit unhappy about the whole existing design .. I would have a seperate place for RFC5424 compatibility but seemed easiest to put those stuff (timestamp and message legnth) under structured data classes even though it is not exactly relevant ..
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 3:25 PM, Negar Safinia negar7918@gmail.com wrote:
ok I will be answering your questions :)
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 3:23 PM, Jochen Schalanda < notifications@github.com> wrote:
@negar7918 https://github.com/negar7918 Thank you very much for your contribution! I have a few questions left and then we're ready to merge.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/Graylog2/syslog4j-graylog2/pull/6#issuecomment-185226601 .
Thanks!
Awesome!
On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 2:32 PM, Jochen Schalanda notifications@github.com wrote:
Merged #6 https://github.com/Graylog2/syslog4j-graylog2/pull/6.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/Graylog2/syslog4j-graylog2/pull/6#event-555082622.
Implemented compatibility with frame header. Frame header is for instance used by syslog() driver in syslog-ng server and is used to support RFC5424.