Open ibrodkin opened 5 months ago
IT appears that ChronoGrpaher process does not always reacts to SIGTERM even though it does have signal_handler for SIGTERM
IT could be that the main thread that receives the signal does not get execution time while other threads are busy
IT appears that ChronoGrpaher process does not always reacts to SIGTERM even though it does have signal_handler for SIGTERM
IT could be that the main thread that receives the signal does not get execution time while other threads are busy