Closed dragorn closed 1 year ago
Thank you for the information. Is there something you would like us to change, or are you just passing along information?
We discussed it on discord and you asked me to open the ticket. I’m passing along information per request.
On Fri, Dec 2, 2022 at 11:41 AM, Straithe @.***> wrote:
Thank you for the information. Is there something you would like us to change, or are you just passing along information?
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe. You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.***>
It looks like it was removed from testing due to build failures when using newer GCC versions: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=991450. I think we'd need to cut a new release that includes #446 to get it included again.
The window for bookworm is closing, I fear the entire ubertooth ecosystem might be left out.
Do you know the deadline or who to talk to to get Ubertooth added?
The window has been missed. At this point you'd need to talk to the release managers.
It turns out that it did actually make it into bookworm in time, the maintainers backported that fix https://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs//main/u/ubertooth/ubertooth_2018.12.R1-5.1_changelog :tada:
Slight bit of pendantry, that was a non-maintainer upload, so bunk@
was nice enough to fix it for Bookworm, not the package maintainer(s) - I should have checked before saying the window has been missed. Sorry for the noise. We can likely close this bug.
Thank you for the update. I can see here that it made it in: https://packages.debian.org/bookworm/libubertooth-dev
Looks like debian bookworm isn't currently including libubertooth (or libubertooth-dev):
https://packages.debian.org/search?searchon=names&keywords=libubertooth
libbtbb is still present however:
https://packages.debian.org/search?suite=default§ion=all&arch=any&searchon=names&keywords=libbtbb