Describe the bug
Java Rules duplicate: eco-design and ecocode rules for Java are identical. How to educate developers? How to differentiate a design rule and code rule? I do not see someone doing a design for writing ++1 or i++ and it is more of a coding best practice.
Currently there are 15 rules and all of them are tagged as eco-design as well as ecocode.
To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
Install the pluugin on SonarQube
Go to Rules and list. Filter for 'eco' in the tags.
15 rules are shown for eco-design as well as ecocode
all these rules are identical
Expected behavior
There should have been a clear identification for the issues that comes up due to incorrect design and should get marked as eco-design
Software Versions
SonarQube Version: Community Edition, Version 9.4 (build 54424)
Describe the bug Java Rules duplicate: eco-design and ecocode rules for Java are identical. How to educate developers? How to differentiate a design rule and code rule? I do not see someone doing a design for writing ++1 or i++ and it is more of a coding best practice.
Currently there are 15 rules and all of them are tagged as eco-design as well as ecocode.
To Reproduce Steps to reproduce the behavior:
Expected behavior There should have been a clear identification for the issues that comes up due to incorrect design and should get marked as eco-design
Software Versions