Closed cfi-gb closed 4 years ago
@cfi-gb could you run black
on the changed file to fix the linting?
@bjoernricks Sure, done and force-pushed the changes.
Merging #308 into ospd-20.08 will not change coverage. The diff coverage is
100.00%
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## ospd-20.08 #308 +/- ##
===========================================
Coverage 73.35% 73.35%
===========================================
Files 23 23
Lines 2560 2560
===========================================
Hits 1878 1878
Misses 682 682
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
ospd/ospd.py | 71.14% <100.00%> (ø) |
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)
,ø = not affected
,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update bfe22fc...2a12cb4. Read the comment docs.
Backport to the ospd-2.0 branch in #309
Noticed the following entry while checking some logs:
Without checking the code it is completely unclear what the last "1675" means. Adding the "PID" text gives some more context.
I'm not absolutely sure if
scan_process.ident
is indeed the PID but a few lines below the following comparison is done so this might be right: