Open marouenbg opened 3 years ago
What did they analyze? A case study in an immunocompromised patient that was positive for SARS-CoV-2 for than 100 days after initial diagnosis.
What methods did they use? Longitudinal genomic analysis of nasopharyngeal swabs.
Does this paper study COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, or a related disease and/or virus? This paper studies the accelerated evolution of SARS-CoV-2 in immunocompromised patients.
What is the main finding (or a few main takeaways)? Two factors could promote an accelerated evolution of SARS-CoV-2: 1) immunodeficiency and 2) treatment with convalescent plasma that could induce a selection pressure to develop escape mutations.
What does this paper tell us about the background and/or diagnostics/therapeutics for COVID-19 / SARS-CoV-2? This paper provides new information about the resistance of SARS-CoV-2 to antibody treatment, potentially suggesting that convalescent plasma transfusions could promote the emergence of escape variants.
Do you have any concerns about methodology or the interpretation of these results beyond this analysis? None.
Title: Case Study: Prolonged Infectious SARS-CoV-2 Shedding from an Asymptomatic Immunocompromised Individual with Cancer
General Information
Please paste a link to the paper or a citation here:
Link: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0092867420314562
What is the paper's Manubot-style citation?
Citation: [@doi:10.1016/j.cell.2020.10.049]
Is this paper primarily relevant to Background or Pathogenesis?
Please list some keywords (3-10) that help identify the relevance of this paper to COVID-19
Please note the publication / review status
Which areas of expertise are particularly relevant to the paper?