Where to Find Papers

[rando2]

I think people may be more overwhelmed than anything by the volume of papers that are available, but I wanted to start a record of collections of relevant papers in case anyone is looking for a place to start:

1. @rbharath commented in #17 that they are maintaining this list
2. @cgreene posted in gitter with these treatment guidelines from UPenn Med (with an excellent list of references at the bottom)
3. The COVID-19 Open Research Dataset, which is intended for machine learning, is actually quite a nice resource for human learning as well, if a huge file to download!
4. @dziakj1 suggested this nicely organized list of papers from UCSF

Please feel free to comment below with additional links for good ways to find papers, or to open a new discussion on any interesting paper you find using by starting a new Issue and filling in one of the new paper templates (either just the top part, or the whole thing!) (Just make sure you search first in case someone already opened one!)

[agitter]

98 is a review article that links to a lot of relevant primary literature

[rbharath]

https://www.researchsquare.com/blog/coronavirus is a very nice list of preprints updated as they come out. I've been using this (and Twitter) to source papers

[raghuyennamalli]

98 is a review article that links to a lot of relevant primary literature

So, what are the guidelines with review papers?

[rando2]

Oh wow, this is an amazing resource that seems to share a lot of our goals: https://disqus.com/by/sinaiimmunologyreviewproject/ If you prefer twitter: https://twitter.com/SinaiImmunol

[rando2]

@raghuyennamalli we don't have a separate policy in place yet -- but definitely open to changing that if you have ideas! Right now, people are just filling out the template, indicating it's a review, but leaving most fields blank, e.g., #98 and #56 I would not be opposed to including a checkbox at the top to ask if it's a review paper and then telling people they don't need to fill in the rest :) I assume most review papers (except this one itself?) will already be peer reviewed.

[raghuyennamalli]

Thanks! The Mt. Sinai link is really good. Lots of good summary for many papers.

There will be lots of reviews that will be published/preprinted soon. We could include those by highlighting what they discussed. Goes without saying that we don't want to reinvent the wheel here. So, saying that "some excellent reviews are listed below. But, we focused on blah blah blah.... " would help us distinguish from other reviews. That's the idea I had. Otherwise, reviews have list of many primary literature that we can look into.

[rando2]

Another cool resource, organized by date: https://www.covid19-archive.com/

[rando2]

From @SiminaB http://biomed-sanity.com/

[dziakj1]

This is a beautiful curated collection of links to papers: https://www.evidenceaid.org/coronavirus-covid-19-evidence-collection/