Closed agitter closed 7 years ago
This is a short paper that employs an LTSM network with random, Word2Vec, and GloVe embeddings. Performance is generally strong without hand-tuning or hand-constructed features applied on top of embeddings, though even the best LTSM method was pareto dominated by existing methods (i.e. there are methods that are better in both precision and recall). I'll probably mention it but it's definitely not transformative over existing approaches. Of note, the authors provide source code for the analyses.
Of note, the authors provide source code for the analyses.
This could be something we stress heavily in the discussion about progressing the field. Made me think of a tweet I saw today about #159
@gwaygenomics : I like the idea of noting exactly which contributions have provided source code. That might be loads of work though...
@gwaygenomics : can you also note that tweet in the #159 discussion?
Might as well provide the link to the code here in case someone comes along later and wants it:
https://github.com/raghavchalapathy/Bidirectional-LSTM-CRF-for-Clinical-Concept-Extraction
I guess this means we can tag @raghavchalapathy also!
Discussed in #167
https://arxiv.org/abs/1611.08373