Closed agitter closed 6 years ago
I tried draftable with our current PDF and https://github.com/greenelab/deep-review/blob/55e779bc418f18e565b3598cc324fa15eeef383b/deep-review.pdf, which is approximately the version we submitted originally.
The results: https://draftable.com/compare/rtWcYEXlwupA
It does great for some sections, but others are marked as entirely new.
In the past, I've used the Word of Microsoft to compare and track changes between the two DOCX files. I think all of the methods will struggle with translocations. We could also try latexdiff. @agitter what do you think?
Will we be able to build a DOCX version of the original submission? I wasn't sure whether we'd have to modify the pre-manubot build system to do that.
If it is easy to compare two DOCX versions, let's try that to see how it compares to draftable. If that takes a lot of effort, I'm okay using draftable as a backup plan.
Word's diff is better than draftable's. gh-pages
commit 005cc002765cb85a9441b57c5f87bd7960508c62 is based on version fb6f113a21059f342fb1f571713d7e3cd01cbeb2, which we tagged as version v0.9-preprint. I used htmlpreview to view that version of the HTML manuscript then copy/pasted it into a DOCX file:
deep-review-v0.9-preprint.docx
I then copy/pasted the current HTML version into another DOCX and compared versions. The diff looks good to me: deep-review-diff.docx
@cgreene once we finalize the manuscript, I'll do this once more so we can submit the DOCX with tracked changes along with the new PDF.
Here is the diff between version v0.9-preprint and b3b57d37c4accabc2e15fd1d3f320a52ce25ed8b: deep-review-diff.docx
Closed per journal resubmission
@dhimmel there are several options in greenelab/manubot-rootstock#54 for creating a manuscript diff to submit to the journal along with the revised manuscript. Do you have a recommendation for deep review?