Closed agitter closed 6 years ago
This is very similar to this paper which has even less cases and controls (n = 28 and n = 15, respectively).
In both papers, they try to predict AD vs. healthy, and both have extremely high accuracy- a much more interesting (and difficult) question would be AD vs. dementia.
http://doi.org/10.1101/070441 (still processing, http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2016/08/21/070441)
At a glance: They use adopted versions of the LeNet and GoogleNet architectures to classify brain scans. They appear to be pre-processing the imaging data into 2D instead of operating on the original dimension. There are 144 resting state fMRI subjects and 302 MIR subjects (those counts are case + control), so there isn't much training data in terms of subjects, but there are many instances once they convert the scans to 2D. They report high accuracy, but I don't know what to expect and they don't compare to any other methods on this dataset. The accuracies they report for related previous work may not be relevant. This paper does refer to many previous deep learning frameworks if we are interested in exploring this topic. The topic itself, supervised learning for neuroimaging, is relevant to the review.