Closed dhimmel closed 6 months ago
Format them for Gigascience like was done in https://github.com/greenelab/connectivity-search-manuscript/commit/46e165b38bf3bf03e17dbdcaa19eae7c396bc284. Ensure affiliations listed multiple times are identical
Switch to numbered affiliations, example at https://github.com/greenelab/meta-review/pull/236/commits/6ac55a9ea43dc408e96f0aaeae2f43c6d7ae754f.
Underway in https://github.com/greenelab/xswap-manuscript/pull/72
See the gigascience.csl
used for connectivity search.
They provide example references here. Some snippets:
Article within a journal by DOI Slifka MK, Whitton JL. Clinical implications of dysregulated cytokine production. Dig J Mol Med. 2000; doi:10.1007/s801090000086.
Book chapter, or an article within a book Wyllie AH, Kerr JFR, Currie AR. Cell death: the significance of apoptosis. In: Bourne GH, Danielli JF, Jeon KW, editors. International review of cytology. London: Academic; 1980. p. 251-306.
Online document Doe J. Title of subordinate document. In: The dictionary of substances and their effects. Royal Society of Chemistry. 1999. http://www.rsc.org/dose/title of subordinate document. Accessed 15 Jan 1999.
Our life will be much easier if as many references as possible use the "Article within a journal by DOI" to reduce citation format polymorphism.
Done in c6f0c5e321895bab2b9a3cf9532ac0a0429246ba and 55ccf900e5d69b9defd93e7b4341ae2cf3612720
Export to EPS vectors, which are used for the PDF output. Otherwise PDF has low rez rasters that look bad. EPS does not support transparency, therefore some figures may have trouble exporting to EPS. There is a way the transparency can be flattened and replaced with non-transparent vectors, but not sure which applications support doing so.
Solution: export to EPS from program creating figure if that works. If that doesn't work, export to PDF/SVG and use another program to convert to EPS.
A high resolution raster format will also be helpful (which we likely already have). PNG or TIFF. These will get converted to JPEGs unfortunately.
See https://github.com/greenelab/xswap-analysis/pull/28
Check what these are (depends on article type).
Message from the editor Hongfang Zhang on 2023-12-18:
Dear Prof. Greene,
Thank you for your email. Your manuscript is almost ready. There are some minor changes that need to be made before formal accept.
Please register your permutation method in the bio.tools and SciCrunch.org databases to receive RRID (Research Resource Identification Initiative ID) and biotoolsID identifiers, and include these in your manuscript. These will facilitate tracking, reproducibility and re-use of your tool.
Please add a section of Availability of Supporting Source Code and Requirements. You can refer to the format below.
Project name: Project homepage: https://github.com/greenelab/xswap-manuscript Operating system(s): Programming language: Other requirements: License: RRID:
- Please send us an editable version of your manuscript.
Thank you and kind regards,
@zietzm is doing items 1 and 2 in https://github.com/greenelab/xswap-manuscript/pull/71.
Okay I think the two remaining things we have to do before submission are:
Okay here's what remains:
Wrt to the supplement, there are references that show up in the main the reference list. I expect this to cause problems. So the options I see are:
@zietzm do you have a preference?
Since I last re-ran the analysis, I can certainly re-export the figures to EPS. I'll get on that today!
Regarding the supplement, I'm inclined to just make it a standalone PDF with its own citations. Seems like it would be easiest.
Okay, we have a supplemental PDF we can use posted at https://github.com/greenelab/xswap-manuscript/pull/74#issuecomment-1872180545. PDF vector images added in https://github.com/greenelab/xswap-analysis/pull/28.
So now the final step is modifying the DOCX, which I build in this job to create artifact manuscript-7358350734-55ccf90.zip
.
The edits that I can think of:
@zietzm do you want to take the lead on this DOCX step? It will mostly be a subtractive process.
Sure, I can do that! Two quick questions:
Do the figures in the DOCX need to be replaced by the PDF figures, or will we include those as separate files?
Should I upload the final DOCX to GitHub or just email it?
Do the figures in the DOCX need to be replaced by the PDF figures, or will we include those as separate files?
I think separate files is okay.
Should I upload the final DOCX to GitHub or just email it?
Copying the submission dossier from email: 2023-12-30_xswap-submission.zip
Email to Casey on 2024-01-12:
Dear Casey S. Greene,
Your manuscript proof is now ready to proceed to publication. Please respond to any copyeditor queries, submit minor corrections, and approve for publication within two working days. Please refer to the supporting documentation, available via the FAQs, Video Tutorials, and User Guide links accessed via Help in the navigation bar.
Article: The probability of edge existence due to... Manuscript ID: GIGA-D-23-00002 Doi: 10.1093/gigascience/giae001 Journal: Giga Science
Once approved, we will prepare your manuscript for online publication and will send an email to you to confirm when your article has published.
Should the article link fail please clear your browser cache and retry
If you need further assistance, please let us know by replying to this email.
Thank you, Oxford University Press
I downloaded the proof and a view of changes and comments made by the copyeditor
I will do a first pass and then notify when done. Note that the Aptara PXE editor can have problems with multiple concurrent sessions, so will close my session when complete and notify.
Some items I didn't address. @zietzm perhaps you'd like to take it from here?
Please provide a complete mailing address
We will need a mailing address for Casey, the corresponding author.
Please provide the short title for running head.
In the proof, we need a short running title, which gets displayed at the top of each page. I put "An Edge Prior based on Node Degree", but would love more suggestions if anything comes to mind.
Please note that the figure citations are not in sequential order in the text. Check and amend accordingly directly in the text.
This might be fixed by switching Fig 10 to the supplementary figure citation. Have not checked. Hopefully we don't need to do restructuring here.
Please provide figure and table captions for all supplementary material.
I believe this is referring to adding figure and table captions in the supplementary PDF and not as a description outside of the supplementary PDF. So this would require updating the supplemental PDF from https://github.com/greenelab/xswap-manuscript/pull/74.
AU: Please provide the publisher details (name and location)
I haven't done any of these. You can try to insert these details into the reference menu, but I can never get the formatting right this way, so I've just been replying in a comment to make them do it. Some of the publisher information might be in manual-references-2023-12-21.yaml
.
@dhimmel Yes, I'll get to work on those now! Thanks so much for all the help this morning!
I'll get to work on those now
Great. Fingers crossed this will be the final submission!
I put "An Edge Prior based on Node Degree"
This sounds good to me!
figure citations are not in sequential order in the text
Unfortunately, 7A is referenced before 6. I manually swapped the figures, captions, and manually adjusted the two references to old table 6 and the one reference to old table 7.
figure and table captions for all supplementary material
Should be addressed in https://github.com/greenelab/xswap-manuscript/pull/76. I believe we must merge to have CI produce the PDF?
publisher details
I think I actually got both of those solved. They are conference papers so I just looked up the official publishers and their locations.
Awesome. I'm not sure about the process of updating the supplement, perhaps we provide that by email if there is no location in aptara PXE5 to update it.
Let me know when you're done with the Aptara edits and then I'll export the diff of our edits and do one final look before submitting it.
Let me know when you're done
I finished my Aptara edits! Currently shows that the document is open elsewhere, but I don't have it open.
Looks like the table caption didn't work properly as that table is HTML instead of markdown...
I opened https://github.com/greenelab/xswap-manuscript/pull/77
Edit: Here's the updated supplement PDF: manuscript.pdf
Submitted the proof revisions and query responses on PXE5. Thanks @zietzm for the help.
Here are the records at time of submission:
2024-01-22_giae001-proof.pdf
2024-01-22_giae001-proof-author-changes-and-replies.pdf
supplement.pdf
, emailed separate, same as @zietzm attachment in preceding comment but I added some PDF metadata fields.Thank you @dhimmel! Really appreciate all your help on these edits!
From GigaScience:
We have implemented all the corrections in your paper attached please find the updated PDF for your review.
2024-01-29_giae001-proof.pdf
Thanks & Regards, Sunita GIGSCI
Things look good to me, but @zietzm would you like to give it a quick glance and make sure everything looks good to publish (especially the rearranged figure)? You can respond to their email directly with any issues or giving the green light.
Thanks @dhimmel, will do this now!
Now published at https://doi.org/10.1093/gigascience/giae001!
Good news in email from 2023-11-01:
I'll note some things here that we'll want to do before the final DOCX submission to GigaScience based on what we learned from the connectivity-search-manuscript proofing process.