Newly created GREP Search&Replace with 3 digit numbering at the beginning of the search query are not sorted in the correct order

[matteobaschera]

I have encountered the following problem:

Summary Newly created GREP Find&Replace with 3 digit numbering at the beginning of the search query are not sorted in the correct order.

Priority Issue | Tolerable problem that interferes with daily operations. In most cases, the issue can be worked around with little negative impact on daily operations.

Steps to Reproduce

• GREP Find & Replace query recreated with same regex = same result.
• GREP Find & Replace query with different regex but same query name = will be sorted in different order but also not in numerically correct position.
• empty GREP Search & Replace query with empty regex but the same query name = will be sorted at a different position, but also not at a numerically correct position.

Current result Search query is sorted based on the first two sort digits (11[\d]) instead of considering the first or more sort digits ([\d\d\d]).

Desired result Consider multi-digit sorting digits for sorting queries.

Environment/Requirements Client environment: Windows 10.0.19043 build 19043 with Adobe InDesign 16.4.x

[grefel]

Current Number sorting does not work with _ in GREP Query name.