gregglind / firefox-pulse

Mozilla Public License 2.0
1 stars 0 forks source link

Multiple layers of score? Multiple time resolutions / time-scales? #2

Open gregglind opened 10 years ago

gregglind commented 10 years ago

14:37 yes, i mentioned something like that 14:37 My hunch is that question I would want is something like "how are you: bad - ok - good" 14:37 or maybe 'how's it going' 14:37 heh 14:37 and let fx take the blame for everything 14:38 that way there is always some 'up' and 'everything' affects down 14:38 so in my experiment to quantify questions... you'd get two at a time. 14:39 so one can calibrate them directly 14:39 (two of the candidate questions) 14:40 leo's satisfaction questions are quite straightforward 14:40 I only saw one. What are you seeing? 14:41 it's funny, i should probably jettison my desire to find deeper meaning in things like satisfaction 14:41 it's fine as a metric 14:41 Also, straightforward doesn't mean it measures what we want it too. 14:41 not everything needs to be an egg hunt 14:41 Statistically, I don't htink it is fine. 14:41 It doesn't have enough motion 14:41 it not sensitive enough 14:41 it takes a lot for people to knock a star off an app. 14:42 fast moving / short memory / in the now is better for id'ing trouble spots 14:42 "right now is awesome" yes / no + phone home wth current state 14:43 where we see that people say no if there is a hang. 14:43 or they are reading newspaper comments 14:43 I am open to the idea of multiple stats here... recommend (or satisfaction) as a long runner 14:43 and something short horizon as a 'oh shit' thing 14:45 so, true story... right now, my gmail is being a turd on reloading. I woud still give fx my normal satisfaction and recommend rating (maybe slightly lowered) 14:45 but 'yo, this fucked' score would change 14:45 If you want eat dogfood on this, let me know, and let's up the addon to actually start asking some shit :) 14:46 maybe with a 'score' and 'why: [ ]' sort of thing