Closed wilbowma closed 10 years ago
Thanks for the report. As it happens, I also noticed and fixed that, just a couple weeks ago in commit 3b81fc2. So a raco pkg update rackjure
should fix that for you?
I get this, thought I suspect it's because Racket is in a development branch.
raco pkg update: package conflicts with existing installed item
package: rackjure
item category: doc
item name: "manual"
I'll try again when I'm done getting this patch merged, but I trust you've fixed it.
On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 10:39:56AM -0700, Greg Hendershott wrote:
Thanks for the report. As it happens, I also noticed and fixed that, just a couple weeks ago in commit 3b81fc2. So a
raco pkg update rackjure
should fix that for you?
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/greghendershott/rackjure/issues/39#issuecomment-48373563
Oh, I wonder if that message is related to https://github.com/greghendershott/rackjure/commit/a70fa27662fd10c3c458f9dce77dff7bc73ef6fc ?
tl'dr; Packages shouldn't use a generic "main.scrbl" or "manual.scrbl" name.
My commit fixed that (IIUC). Using the very latest rackjure, is it OK for you now? Both errors gone?
Actually, that fixed. Both errors gone.
Thanks!
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 06:15:17AM -0700, Greg Hendershott wrote:
Oh, I wonder if that message is related to https://github.com/greghendershott/rackjure/commit/a70fa27662fd10c3c458f9dce77dff7bc73ef6fc ?
tl'dr; Packages shouldn't use a generic "main.scrbl" or "manual.scrbl" name.
My commit fixed that (IIUC). Using the very latest rackjure, is it OK for you now? Both errors gone?
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/greghendershott/rackjure/issues/39#issuecomment-48728397
I noticed the following when rebuilding Racket today: