Open dsyme opened 9 years ago
Don what would be the best way of doing this in F#? I am guessing mailboxes? Can we call the mailbox /dev/null?
I think we need a dependency on Akka.net . A concept this complex is too large to be entirely rewritten from scratch, and should instead leverage the inherent synergies available in the .net eco-system.
It would also open up the possibilities of running Nothing nodes on remote machines.
Would you lean towards a Nothing per Instance model or a clustered Nothing Singleton?
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 10:19 AM, Michael Newton notifications@github.com wrote:
I think we need a dependency on Akka.net . A concept this complex is too large to be entirely rewritten from scratch, and should instead leverage the inherent synergies available in the .net eco-system.
It would also open up the possibilities of running Nothing nodes on remote machines.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/gregoryyoung/nothing/issues/30#issuecomment-127910324 .
Studying for the Turing test
I think losing the singleton aspect would be a mistake, but you are entirely correct that clustering would be required for a true high availibility solution. As such I'd lean towards a clustered Nothing Singleton.
I see a big future for Nothing as a service.
https://devnull-as-a-service.com
On Wednesday, August 5, 2015, Don Syme notifications@github.com wrote:
I see a big future for Nothing as a service.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/gregoryyoung/nothing/issues/30#issuecomment-127953166 .
Studying for the Turing test
We should probably build in some Azure queues as well, you need that resiliency in case something goes wrong whilst calculating nothing.
Please reimlpement this functionality using the "micro-actor" approach being so persuasively advocated by @gregoryyoung. See https://twitter.com/gregyoung/status/628618631895744514