Closed gregrs-uk closed 8 years ago
‘Percentage of relevant OSM nodes/ways with FHRS match or postcode’ includes OSM nodes/ways which have an fhrs:id and postcode that both match the FHRS database, and those with a postcode but no fhrs:id. This doesn’t include those with a non-matching fhrs:id, or those for which the postcodes don’t agree (including cases where the OSM postcode is not set). This is probably misleading because establishments with a valid fhrs:id but no postcode will not be included. It’s meant as a measure of ‘completeness’, with the goal to tag establishments with a postcode and possibly an fhrs:id, but I think the label probably needs changing.
This spreadsheet showing structure of CASE ... WHEN filtering might be useful
e.g. Dave F suggests 'Could a 'Relevant OSM nodes/ways without fhrs:id' statistic be added?'