search

gremau / NMEG_FluxProc

Code used to process and manage eddy covariance data for the New Mexico Elevation Gradient.
8 stars 2 forks source link

Wrong Fc submitted to MPI gapfiller? #10

Closed gremau closed 9 years ago

gremau commented 9 years ago

Wrong Fc submitted to gapfiller?

Observed data submitted for gapfilling is different than the observed data going into the AF files. It appears that the MPI gapfiller is returning different Fc values during observed time periods that what can be found in the fluxall_qc file ( fc_raw_massman_wpl, which is presumably what went to MPI eddyproc).

This is most likely because fc_raw_massman_wpl is not submitted to the MPI gapfiller - something else is (no sure what yet). This is at least the case at PJ in 2011.

See the warning generated by prepare_AF_output_data.m

gremau commented 9 years ago

On second examination - the differences between the observed values in the fluxall_qc file and the MPI output are very small. Perhaps this is just rounding error?

gremau commented 9 years ago

It is rounding error. There is now code to check for differences between Fluxall QC and returned gapfiller data within a tolerance. It should now be resolved and there should be good reasons that this error and output plot appear. See:

e7d1b25 and 847e326