Open gremmyz opened 1 year ago
From the module website under the Guidelines for the dev team to follow when triaging PE bugs
section:
Handling manual edits to the data file: AB3 UG specifies the current level of support for manually editing the data file. At least that level of support should be supported in the new product as well.
I believe we have also provided the same if not more support by describing how the data is saved in the UG. Therefore, we will reject this bug report.
Team chose [response.Rejected
]
Reason for disagreement: Yes, that would be the case if the bug was classified as a functionality bug.
However, I classified it as a feature flaw. I believe that this should be a feature flaw because as per the module website:
if the product is missing a critical functionality that makes the product less useful to the intended user, it can be reported as a bug of type
Type.FeatureFlaw
.
My original report:
it might cause minor inconveniences to some users when they try to edit the data file or if a new user looks at the .json file and accidentally delete something and the input becomes invalid, which then causes the application to restart a fresh data file.
I believe that I have given reasoning for this to be classified as a feature flaw.
.json
file and accidentally deletes something, they would have trouble retrieving it.Both these reasons shows that this flaw causes minor (perhaps unlikely) inconveniences to users, thus making the product less useful to intended users. To make the feature of being able to manually edit the .json
file more useful, it would be good for the product to return an error message such as "Data from [directory_file]
could not be read. See [log_file_name]
for more information on how to resolve this."
Rather than response.Rejected
, I believe this should be response.notInScope
instead.
Edit: On hindsight, I feel like it is quite severe that the app deletes all data when invalid data is entered. Given the constraint of the Human-Editable File, editing the text file may not be a very rare situation as I previously perceived. I propose to raise the severity level of this bug to severity.Medium
instead of severity.Low
.
Since manual editing of data is reserved for advanced users, this bug will not affect most users. (Not severity.High
)
Type: Design Flaw
Currently,
editing the .json files to have incorrect input
or missing input
will cause the application data to be corrupted, and the application to restart with a new file.
This behavior is documented in the UG, but perhaps it should also be a planned enhancement in the DG, as it might cause minor inconveniences to some users when they try to edit the data file or if a new user looks at the .json file and accidentally delete something and the input becomes invalid, which then causes the application to restart a fresh data file.