search

gremmyz / pe

0 stars 0 forks source link

DG only for librarians? #21

Open gremmyz opened 1 year ago

gremmyz commented 1 year ago

As mentioned in the title:

image.png

it could be possible that not just librarians, but other developers too, will be interested in enhancing your product. Perhaps it would be better to indicate it as such.

nus-se-script commented 1 year ago

Team's Response

We have mentioned librarians as an example in the DG but this not mean that we are limiting other developers for enhancing the product as well.

Items for the Tester to Verify

:question: Issue response

Team chose [response.Rejected]

Reason for disagreement: > We have mentioned librarians as an example in the DG but this not mean that we are limiting other developers for enhancing the product as well.

I disagree with this. While your intention is to not limit other developers in enhancing the product, since this is in the Introduction section of the DG (i.e. this will be the first thing in the document that interested developers read), it would give them the wrong impression that this Developer Guide is ONLY for librarians who are also (technically gifted?) developers.

I think instead of specifying that "this DG is written to aid present and future librarians who may be technically gifted", you could change it to indicate a more general group of developers (e.g. this DG is written to aid developers who may be interested in helping to maintain, upgrade, and evolve ExpressLibrary by providing them...).