Closed greyblake closed 4 years ago
With hashbrown::HashMap:
test bench_detect ... bench: 20,047,742 ns/iter (+/- 907,381)
test bench_detect_script ... bench: 284,873 ns/iter (+/- 21,324)
With std::collections::HashMap
test bench_detect ... bench: 30,486,364 ns/iter (+/- 1,019,361)
test bench_detect_script ... bench: 285,050 ns/iter (+/- 17,296)
std::collections::HashMap
is 50% slower, because it uses SipHash 1-3 hashing algorithm by default.
hashbrown uses AHash.
Because now it's the default HashMap in std: https://blog.rust-lang.org/2019/07/04/Rust-1.36.0.html#a-new-hashmapk,-v%3E-implementation