CIViC features discussion: How can CIViC be improved to encourage more of the variant curation process to happen on the CIViC website

susannasiebert commented 3 months ago

Submitter Name

Susanna Kiwala

Submitter Affiliation

Washington University in St. Louis

Submitter Github Handle

susannasiebert

Additional Submitter Details

CIViC developer

Project Details

Parts of various variant, evidence, and assertion curation workflows tend to happen outside of CIViC. With that, a lot of discussion, knowledge acquisition, and decisions are lost to the wider CIViC user base since the happen opaquely outside of CIViC.

The discussion group will try to explore different options of which features might be useful to allow more of this work to happen inside of CIViC. Some ideas are:

Autosaving of in-progress revisions/submission
Allowing the creation of "draft" evidence items and and assertions that can be incomplete and not (yet) pass the full CIViC validation, and can be edited without going through a formal revision cycle.
Enable creation and assigning of tasks and having a dashboard to see tasks assigned to you

Required Knowledge

Current CIViC curators and editors or people that are interested in contributing curation to the CIViC knowledgebase

malachig commented 2 months ago

A preliminary survey of interest (where every participant was allowed to vote twice) resulted in 10 votes for this topic.

susannasiebert commented 2 months ago

https://wustl-hipaa.zoom.us/j/98089888759?pwd=n3hYh8ibh3DVwGLHcMmVqZ0ohMSt7L.1

susannasiebert commented 2 months ago

Meeting notes: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sBemGLjHsvSMXyveJcpYjYe5BI0qXvjVjH6iBnqV6wQ

Laveniya commented 2 months ago

@susannasiebert Thanks for the chat - a message to consider if bulk upload into draft status is possible :)

griffithlab / civic-meeting