Closed benbelow closed 8 years ago
Hi Ben,
Thanks a lot for your pull request. What would be an example of a case where you would want a rest without a following note? Wouldn't that be the end?
-Garrett
Hi Garrett,
I'm using the library to attempt to procedurally generate melodies, and there re a few cases where I'd like to be able to add a rest without yet knowing the next note in the sequence - for example, if I'm trying to exactly write one bar, and the last beat is a rest.
Cheers, Ben
Hi Ben,
Got it, this has been merged. Thanks for your help. Your project sounds interesting, let me know if it's somewhere I can check out.
-Garrett
Hi Garrett,
the project should be publicly available on my Github here https://github.com/benbelow/MidiGenerator
I'm writing it as part of a song a week challenge I'm doing (this week's theme is 'experimental' :P) , so I don't expect to work on it as much after this week.
Cheers! Ben
@grimmdude this makes me think a refactor of the duration computation, both notes and rests. What do you think to centralize and generalize to allow any types of duration? Think of tuple families, long rest (a track could wait a long before start)
-mauro
Hi Mauro,
Couldn't these durations be accomplished with the existing method of computation?
-Garrett
@grimmdude aw, sorry, forgot its the same calculation as notes duration. After all it is fine, there are few duration that could be implemented (32th) and tuplets in general (tuplets of quarters, 16th as an example), finally the double dot. Let me know what you think, and maybe open a related issue. Thanks
-Mauro
The use case being if I want to add just a rest, without necessitating a following note (as the current implementation of wait implies). A duration of 0 and non-zero wait should now allow this.