Closed rmw83 closed 4 years ago
For all translational and rotational partition function the standard textbook expressions are implemented, the vibrational partition function is described here: https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.201200497
Not sure if this is answering your question.
Specifically, please refer to this block from the GFN2 output:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
temp. (K) partition function enthalpy heat capacity entropy
cal/mol cal/K/mol cal/K/mol J/K/mol
300.00 VIB 466. 3252.628 15.858 22.662
ROT 0.579E+05 894.267 2.981 24.775
INT 0.270E+08 4146.895 18.839 47.437
TR 0.255E+28 1490.445 4.968 41.638
TOT 5637.3402 23.8067 89.0754 372.6916
T/K H(0)-H(T)+PV H(T)/Eh T*S/Eh G(T)/Eh
------------------------------------------------------------------------
300.00 0.898367E-02 0.134278E-01 0.425852E-01 -0.291574E-01
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Moving forward...
I am interested in calculating the enthalpy correction term [ZPE + finite temperature + PV] from GFN2. The ZPE is written explicitly furthur in the output, not shown here. The finite temperature contributions are from assessing the rotational, translational, and vibrational (specifically to correct the ZPE) modes of the molecule. For PV, work done is typically equal to kT for an idael gas, but here PV is referred as a correction term (i think?) for the difference between H(0) and H(T). However, I am not sure what this value means, where it comes from, or if it refers to PV in this context.
EDIT
What is 'INT' from the output and how is it calculated as well?
The “INT” contribution (meaning internal) describes the partition function of the internal degrees of freedom, which in this case is the total of the vibrational and rotational partition function.
The H(0) – H(T) + PV output is calculated as H(T) – ZPE and not used for anything except this printout. So for enthalpy corrections you are probably looking for the H(T) output here.
Thank you very much.
One last question, how is H(0) defined then? I thought it was the total energy before the enthalpy correction, but that doesn't align with the mathematics shown above. In other words... it appears as though H(T) might have two meanings in the output, one to signify the difference between enthalpy corrected and original energies, and another to signify the enthalpy corrected energy itself.
H(0) is given relative to H(T) to avoid defining/calculating it, but this is kinda not-an-answer to your question. So no, it [H(T)] does not have two different meanings here, but maybe one odd representation.
Also note, that at this point none of the thermostatistical contributions actually contains the total energy, the total enthalpy is given only in a later printout.
Describe the bug
To Reproduce Steps to reproduce the behaviour:
xtb
with a hessian (--hess) flag for thermochemistry calculations with additional input (--input thermo.inp) to adjust the temperature to 300 K. The structure has been previously optimized so only a single-point calculation is performed.Please provide all input and output file such that we confirm your report. (Attached here) thermo.zip
Expected behaviour N/A
Additional context N/A