Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago
I can't see much argument for (1) - text is cheap, plans are fairly long.
(2) could allow for some interesting possibilities. Some of the further-out
benefits of this could be complementary to #213.
Some amount of analysis could happen without using a link shortener - for ex.
we could parse stored plans to find links and compile most-linked-to stats and
the like. What we couldn't do without an intermediary would be tracking how
many people click on a link.
Possible objections to shortened links:
* Not everyone may be interested in having their exit traffic from plans tracked. I imagine this would specially be an issue if we were storing analytics with a 3rd party. Is there an easy way to give users an opt-out? I can't decide if the opt-out should come from the author or the reader.
* Content with shortened links is locked into the continued existence of the shortening service. We could mitigate this by leaving the unshortened links in the text that users edit. This way, personal archives would still contain the original links.
* The annoyance of not being able to see a link's true destination URL. Could be somewhat mitigated by storing it in the title attribute (to give a tooltip) or something along those lines.
None of these are dealbreakers, but they do need some consideration. More
importantly, it's a cool idea, but this change isn't worth doing unless someone
is going to put in the coding time to make some nifty community features out of
it. I don't expect that will be me, and based on our current levels of
developer participation I wouldn't hold your breath.
Original comment by ian.gree...@gmail.com
on 16 Dec 2010 at 7:59
Definitely not holding my breath. I think I more just wanted to throw it out
there and see what other people thought. I suspect someday, Plans will
actually evolve a bit more, and I wanted to make sure this idea was sitting
around to be found.
Original comment by rootwi...@gmail.com
on 18 Dec 2010 at 12:55
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
rootwi...@gmail.com
on 26 Nov 2010 at 9:18