Closed ghost closed 9 years ago
Splendid idea! :+1: Would be good not to duplicate the license, though. The first one has a /*!
prefix, the second a /*
one. I don't know if we have any rules of engagement for that to abide by, but if not, maybe just the second is good?
The manual Makefile
pokery I hacked up long ago to comply with asks at the time probably could be torn out and replaced with something standardized.
Fixed make build
duplicating the license twice - I can look at switching the Makefile
over to package.json
scripts & npub later today if that sounds good with you.
:ship: Sweet! I'd love npub
to take over those bits.
Do you have the bits required to publish assertive? I can't recall we've tested that so far, and it would be nice to proof that we have good bus factor mitigation in place already for assertive
.
Aside from you, Massa does:
$ npm owner ls assertive
smassa
ecmanaut
We did set up a groupon user awhile ago, although it hasn't got much use yet :smiley:. We should really start using it...
$ npm owner add groupon assertive
Perfect. Added; take it away! :)
Can't publish due to some bash error in Makefile - I'm using Ubuntu 14.04 BTW.
I'll make the npub
change tonight and submit a PR - then I can publish.
v2.0.1
Just felt like cleaning up shop a bit - what do you think @johan?